
Some teams are drowning in process. Others are drowning in its absence. Both are still gasping for air.
And yet, when performance dips, when turnover spikes, or when burnout hits the tipping point, leaders look at the people first. They ask who needs coaching, who is not “resilient,” or who is falling short.
But in most cases, the real problem is the system.
Not broken people. Broken design.
I have lost count of the times I have been asked to “fix” a team. Often, what they actually needed was a functional schedule. Sometimes, it was a feedback loop. Other times, a decision tree that does not require a PhD to navigate. Teams are not fragile. They are tired of working against the very systems that are supposed to support them.
Let me go back to that early leadership moment I shared in my last post.
We had a 35% abandon rate. No structured breaks. Phones ringing into the void. Frustrated customers. Burned-out staff. Turnover rising.
The common narrative would have blamed the reps. Said they were not committed. They could not handle the pressure. They needed more training. That maybe they were not a “good fit.”
But the issue was not them. It was the structure or lack of it.
Once we introduced a simple, data-informed schedule and gave the team a say in shaping it, everything shifted. Calls got answered. Morale lifted. Performance improved. Not because the people changed, but because the system did.
Here is what broken systems often sound like:
- “That is just how we do it.”
- “We were told we could not change this.”
- “The process says…”
- “We are too busy to fix that right now.”
- “It is not ideal, but people get used to it.”
These phrases do not just signal dysfunction. They signal resignation. They are the sound of people adapting to failure instead of fixing it.
Meanwhile, leaders stack on more training, more tools, more pressure, hoping people will “rise to the challenge.” They will, until they cannot. Then you will call it burnout, when what really happened is systemic failure.
If your operations depend on heroics, your problem is not your team. It is your infrastructure.
If clarity is buried under complexity, your problem is not engagement. It is design.
If performance varies wildly across shifts or teams, you do not need more motivation. You need consistency.
Before you coach performance, audit design. If your team is gasping for air, the leak might be structural.
